Major-General Harrison was the first of the Regicides to be executed by being hanged, drawn and quartered on 13 October 1660. Harrison, after being hanged for several minutes and then cut open, was reported to have leaned across and hit his executioner …

Wikipedia on Thomas Harrison. Hung, drawn, and quartered for signing the death warrant of King Charles I.

Hit the executioner after his guts had been spilled.  That’ll show ‘em.

For it must be noted, that men must either be caressed or else annihilated; they will revenge themselves for small injuries, but cannot do so for great ones; the injury therefore that we do to a man must be such that we need not fear his vengeance.

Niccolo Machiavelli, The Prince (via salitterdrying)

thosepeskydames:

Where has all the shouting gone?

Emily talks politics and feminism and wonders if we’re moving backwards in terms of women’s representation.

This Dame:

Tumblr: http://siouxsieismygrandma
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/icaruskissmygun 

Something you’d like to talk about? Want to guest vlog for Those Pesky Dames? Click to find out how: http://thosepeskydames.tumblr.com/guest-videos

I think university has changed a lot, though it’s hard to pin down exactly the moment that happened.  This is a late night, sleep deprived ramble, largely of conjecture rather than things I have hard facts on.  So feel free to pick it apart.

1. Since Labour came to power the provision of apprenticeships that train people on the job has significantly reduced.  People are pushed into universities as the way to gain vocational training.  With the introduction of fees and increasingly uncertain job markets people who are going into debt over university tend to want to get a job which they think will get them a decent job at the end of it, especially at institutions which predominately service working class or less affluent demographics, such as where I am, which has a massive business school.

Restructuring the way university is accessed, introducing a financial concern, means that courses such as women’s studies or even broader arts and humanities courses which (should) make the student develop deeper understandings of ideas such as equality drop in uptake in exchange for courses which don’t have such matters as their concerns and so their discussion becomes extracurricular.

2. With the change in the demographic which accessed university (i.e. that working class students gained more access) the socialisation as to status, position, and expectations of the main student body changed.  By which I mean where you have working class people making political demands it’s usually substantiated around pay and conditions.  Working class women’s movements made demands for pay and recognition equal to their male counterparts, access to working the same jobs rather than in women’s-only jobs, and so on.

In the 80s and prior to that, where student’s social backgrounds were generally more affluent, they came from a background which had different expectations and demands to make, and more time to spend articulating them without the need to get a part time job to make ends meet.  This point I think is a substantial factor in the general change in radicality of student politics.

3. The way in which we teach matters such as women’s struggle in schools through history lessons and sporadically citizenship in some instances are very much a “they fought for this and then they got it.” Of course it’s good that the matters are taught to an extent, but they are subject to an act of recuperation in doing so. They become a part of normalising the system rather than for providing a basis for criticising it.

“Women demanded x, y, and z. They achieved [some legal recognition of a status of equality] and so it is today.”

I don’t know if this is something that’s substantially changed over time, has only more recently been introduced into history lessons or what.  But I am fairly certain that the accessibility of documentaries, factual TV/radio shows, and so on, in regard to such matters has substantially increased and this has a similar effect of socialisation regardless if the educational conditions somebody was under.

4. There’s a hell of a lot more out there to distract us.  Fifteen different magazines to tell us how to be more like [celebrity] and then another 20 to tell us why [celebrity]’s life is much worse than you’d think.  Many more movies, and easier access to them, umpteen different TV channels, a many more clubs, computer games, and a heavy emphasis on a consumerist society which keeps on pushing outwards.  After a day of study, some extra hours of work, people don’t generally want to engage in complicated political arguments they want to relax and interact with brain mulch that takes their mind away from the drudgery of life.

Discussion on matters such as women’s struggles push the boundaries of comfort.  Why engage with ideas that say that society is fundamentally corrupt and wrong and has to change, when it’s much more convenient to just kick off your shoes, slouch in front of the TV and fall asleep listening to Andrew Marr reiterating how Europe is basically responsible for every good thing that ever happened ever in his latest documentary series?

———

So I may have diverged from the point, I’m not sure.  And I certainly could have been more articulate.  I should point out I’m not trying to implicate one gender over another as being implicit in the sort of general process I’m outlining but more trying to give an idea in the factors that have overall changed the nature of the discourse on university campuses.

Today is the day the people who send people to die in wars to bolster their failing economies, get to tell everyone they think wars are awful and horrid and they care very deeply about “our” soldiers who die in them.

Labour politicians who sent troops to die and kill in Iraq and Afghanistan, Conservative politicians who have sent Cameron off to support arms sales to Arab states in the midst of civil wars for the last two years. Today they get to wear a poppy, go to a church service and convince us that their conscience is clean, that there’s no blood on their hands.

Lets also take a moment to consider why it is we need charity to support the wounded servicemen and their families. The NHS is being hacked to pieces, social worker’s loads are being increased tenfold, and care homes are being closed. But at least the politicians responsible can rest assured that they’ve made a minuscule donation so that they can publicly declare their very grave concern and support for the people they’ve sent to die and be wounded in a war they have no part in.

If you think the best way to remember the war dead is by buying a paper flower then please have a pleasant day. If you think the best way to do that is to stop sending people to war and build a society which cares for everybody then we still have some ways to go.

No war but class war.

I don’t know at what point attempting this seemed like it would be a good idea.

But it wasn’t.

Can we talk about violence when no physical or biological object is hurt? This would be a case of what is referred to above as truncated violence, but nevertheless highly meaningful. When a person, a group, a nation is displaying the means of physical violence, whether throwing stones around or testing nuclear arms, there may not be violence in the sense that anyone is hit or hurt, but there is nevertheless the threat of physical violence and indirect threat of mental violence that may even be characterized as some type of psychological violence since it constrains human action. Indeed, this is also the intention: the famous balance of power doctrine is based on efforts to obtain precisely this effect.

Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, Peace, and Peace Research. Journal of Peace Research6(3), 167–191.

Here is the reading list Aamna sent me, for everyone who asked. THANK YOU, COMRADE CHOONG. <33333

guydebatwing:

·  Value, Price and Profit by Karl Marx (1865)

·  Critique of the Gotha Programme by Karl Marx (1875)

·  Socialism: Utopian and Scientific Frederick Engels (1880)

·  The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State by Frederick Engels (1884)

·  Ludwig Feuerbach and the End of Classical German Philosophy by Frederick Engels (1886)

·  The Meaning of Hegel by Georgi Plekhanov (1891)

·  On Historical Materialism by Franz Mehring (1893)

·  The Materialist Conception of History by Georgi Plekhanov (1897)

·  On The Role of The Individual in History by Georgi Plekhanov (1898)

·  Reform or Revolution by Rosa Luxemburg (1900)

·  What is to be done? by Vladimir Lenin (1902)

·  Materialism and Empirio-Criticism by Vladimir Lenin (1908)

·  Elements of Dialectics/On Dialectics by Vladimir Lenin (1914)

·  The Right of Nations to Self-Determination by Vladimir Lenin (1914)

·  The Collapse of the Second International by Vladimir Lenin (1915)

·  Imperialism: the Highest Stage of Capitalism by Vladimir Lenin (1917)

·  The State and Revolution by Vladimir Lenin (1918)

·  The Proletarian Revolution and the Renegade Kautsky by Vladimir Lenin (1918)

·  Left Wing Communism an Infantile Disorder by Vladimir Lenin (1920)

·  The Third International after Lenin by Leon Trotsky (1928)

·  The Permanent Revolution by Leon Trotsky (1931)

·  Fascism: What it is and How to Fight it? by Leon Trotsky (1932)

·  The Revolution Betrayed by Leon Trotsky (1936)

·  The Transitional Program by Leon Trotsky (1938)

·  Their Morals and Ours by Leon Trotsky (1938)

·  In Defense of Marxism by Leon Trotsky (1940)

·  Lenin and Trotsky: What they really stood for by Ted Grant and Alan Woods (1969)

·  Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses by Louis Althusser (1970)

·  Dialectical Logic by Evald Ilyenkov (1974)

I’m going to write a paper and get it published in all the journals.

It will be titled “The Slytherin Complex: the Pacification of Civil Agency.”

It will discuss the neurosis developed through media forms, socialisation and political rhetoric that causes civil society to condemn a praxis which can achieve real change as being rooted in behaviour that is intrinsically evil.  Which is then normalised by constructing a perception that people who advocate such behaviour are not themselves necessarily evil, but they can overcome their situation by changing the behaviour rather than their purpose.

The point of reference will be the Harry Potter books and the occasional mention that “not all Slytherins are bad, some of them can be loyal too!” Id est, Slytherin behaviour patterns remain bad it is only by submission to other archetypical traits that they can redeem themselves.

And it will be published in all the journals.

uwe-swss:

Photos of the SWSS stall from Freshers Fair and supporters of the Hands Off Our Classmates campaign!

Read the latest on the situation at London Met. [x]

More photos from the day here. [x]

The day was a massive success with over 150 new contacts, 6 new sign-ups to the party and new people to the first meeting, on a Friday of Freshers week no less!   And with coach tickets to #Demo2012 now on sale this year is going to be siiiiick!

vasundharaa:

This is a resource post for all the Good White Persons out there. You know, the ones who say things like “It’s not my fault I’m white! Don’t generalize white people!”, or “I’m appreciating your culture! You should be proud!”, or “Why do you hate all white people, look I’m a special snowflake who’s not racist give me an award for meeting the minimum requirements for being a decent human being”.

Well, if you are actually interested in understanding racism and how it ties into cultural appropriation, please read instead of endlessly badgering PoCs on tumblr with your cliched, unoriginal arguments and repeating the same questions over and over.

On White Privilege
aka don’t blame me just because I’m white:

On Reverse Racism
aka you are being racist against white people:

On Cultural Appropriation
aka I’m just appreciating your culture:

Assorted Vials of White Tears and Miscellaneous Antidotes
aka I can’t change that I’m white/not all whites are racist/we are all humans:

Okay. I agree. I’ve been socially conditioned not to notice racism and recognize my privilege. What can I do?

I don’t care about this bullshit; you’re making a big deal out of nothing, go home and delete your blog:

philosophy-of-praxis:

Goldsmiths University occupation of the Whitehead building.

gisellews:

Final project based on ‘For the Voice’ by El Lissitzky for 3-D Problem Solving.

Original artwork, my sculptural rendition of it, and the final poster of it.